The 35-watt Intel Core i9-14900T processor is not inferior in performance to the 65-watt AMD Ryzen 9 7900, but there is a nuance

by alex

Ryzen 9 7900 is noticeably cheaper


35-watt 24-core Intel Core i9-14900T processor was tested in Geekbench 6, and despite its low frequencies (1.1-5.5 GHz), it turned out to be quite powerful : the difference with the Core i9-14900K (3.2-6.0 GHz) was only about 22%.

Intel Core i9-14900T scored 3019 points in the single-threaded test and 16 385 points in the multi-threaded test. The result of the 125-watt Core i9-14900K – 3186 and 20 961 points respectively. Obviously, the Core i9-14900T is a more efficient solution when evaluating the balance of performance and power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7900 with its 65 W is between these models, and its performance – 2823 points in the single-threaded test and 16 750 points in the multi-threaded test. It seems that the superiority of the Core i9-14900T over the Ryzen 9 7900 (taking into account lower consumption) is obvious, but the nuance is that the Core i9-14900T is noticeably more expensive: $550 versus $400. And given the price, the advantage of the Intel processor no longer seems obvious.

The Kia Sonet crossover has fallen in price in Russia

You may also like

Leave a Comment